Drawing for DIRECT

USPTO serial 77211815

DIRECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIRECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wendy Robertson

WENDY ROBERTSON BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ6060 POPLAR AVE STE 440MEMPHIS, TN 38119-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance services, namely, underwriting, brokerage and consultation in the fields of automobile liability, property, casualty, physical damage and life insuranceACTIVEDec 5, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 20, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 20, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 3, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 2, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 2, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 20, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 15, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 15, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 28, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance