USPTO serial 77212073
GEEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4065029Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2011
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GEEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan A. Raynes, Esq.
Lynn M. Jordan Finnegan, Henderson, et al901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish; food products made from fish and shellfish, namely, fish cakes, fish croquettes, fish sticks and fish dumplings; processed meat; processed beans; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; processed frozen fruits and vegetables; jellies; eggs and processed eggs; edible oils and fats; soups; preparations for making soup; preparations for making stew or bouillon; fermented bean; jelly made from devil's tongue root; skim milk powder and egg powder | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Curry; curry spice; pasta sauces; seasonings; salt; sauces for pasta and noodles; sauces; spices; rice; husked oats; husked barley; flour for food; processed cereals; cereal preparations, namely, processed cereals; noodles; pasta; boiled and dried noodles; pre-cooked frozen foods, namely, frozen breads, frozen pasta, frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; prepared entrees consisting primarily of rice or pasta; dumpling; sandwiches; sushi; hamburger sandwiches; pizzas; boxed lunches, namely, hot dog sandwiches and rice-based bento; hot dog sandwiches; meat pies; ravioli; candy; bread; biscuits; buns; cakes; pies; preparations for making instant cakes, cookies or puddings; preparations for making ice creams or sherbets; ice creams; sherbets; batter mix, namely, dry blend of flour; yeast powder; yeast; baking powder; tempura batter mix, namely, mix for making batter for tempura; breadcrumbs; pastries and confectionery, namely, candy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshin Seifun Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshin Seifun Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshin Seifun Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GEEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | 44EP | 44(e) PETITION - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |