USPTO serial 77213856
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology consultation for schools, small businesses, and homes; Providing a website that features information on computer technology; Providing information at the specific request of end-users by means of telephone or global computer networks; Providing planning and engineering services in the field of information and communications networks for schools, small businesses, and homes; Providing specific information as requested by customers via the Internet; Technological consultation in the technology field of computer hardware, computer software, computer networking, network security, messaging, Internet technologies, and convergence technologies including voice over IP (VOIP) and IP cameras for schools, small businesses, and homes; Technology advice provided to Internet users by means of a support hotline; Computer consultation for schools, small businesses, and homes; Computer consultation in the field of computer security for schools, small businesses, and homes; Consultation in the field of ergonomics, namely, designing workplace facilities and equipment to optimize efficiency and safety for schools, small businesses, and homes; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Charitable services, namely, providing computer equipment to schools; Computer diagnostic services; Computer disaster recovery planning; Computer graphics services; Computer monitoring service which tracks hardware performance and processes and sends out historical reports and alerts; Computer network design for for schools, small businesses, and homes; Computer network design for others for schools, small businesses, and homes; Computer security service, namely, hard drive erasure; Computer security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Computer services, namely monitoring and reporting on the performance, availability, and errors of websites of others; Computer services, namely monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the Internet traffic control and content control of the websites of others; Computer services, namely, computer system administration for others; Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; Computer services, namely, data recovery services; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, filtering of unwanted e-mails; Computer services, namely, managing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, monitoring the websites of others to improve scalability and performance of websites of others; Computer services, namely, online scanning, detecting, quarantining and eliminating viruses, worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computers and electronic devices; Computer services, namely, redirecting electronic mail to changed personal electronic address; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of electronic messaging systems and applications for others; Computer site design; Computer systems analysis; Computer virus protection services; Customization of computer hardware and software; Design and maintenance of computer sites for third parties; Design for others in the field of computer networks for schools, small businesses, and homes; Design of computer networks for others for schools, small businesses, and homes; Design of home pages, computer software and web sites; Displaying the web sites and images of others on a computer server; Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Installation of computer software; Integration of computer systems and networks; Leasing of computers; Maintenance of computer software; Monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; Periodic upgrading of computer software for others; Recovery of computer data; Rental of computers; Rental of computers and software; Repair of computer software; Repair of damaged computer programs; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Technical support, namely, providing back-up computer programs and facilities; Updating of computer software; Updating of computer software for others | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 14, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |