Drawing for PEACE

USPTO serial 77214169

PEACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Dillon, Esquire

THOMAS J. DILLON, ESQUIRE HIRSCHLER FLEISCHER2100 E CARY STRICHMOND, VA 23223-7034UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, wineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2009INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Feb 5, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 28, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 21, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance