USPTO serial 77214501
RIBBON FIBER TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIBBON FIBER TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald R. Santucci, Esq.
RONALD R. SANTUCCI, ESQ. FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Home goods made of textiles, namely, bedding, namely, comforters, mattress pads, insulated bed blankets, feather beds and synthetic fiber feather beds; cushions; sleeping bags; pillows | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Textile fiber, namely, plastic fiber, glass fiber | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Fabrics, namely, non-woven fabrics; cotton fabrics; upholstery fabrics | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, footwear, hats, socks, gloves, scarves, ties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |