USPTO serial 77214771
THE BIG DENT COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 2009
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with THE BIG DENT COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Moro, IL
Moro, IL
ROXANA, IL
ROXANA, IL
Roxana, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Himich
Matthew J. Himich THOMPSON COBURN LLPOne U.S. Bank PlazaST. LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | automobile body repair and finishing for others, namely, paintless dent removal; paint chip and windshield chip and scratch repair and velour and carpet repair | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Binkley, Charles Daniel
- Other trademarks owned by Binkley, Charles Daniel
- Other trademarks owned by COSMETIC CAR COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COSMETIC CAR COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Binkley, Charles Daniel
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named THE BIG DENT COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 19, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 19, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |