Drawing for YUJI

USPTO serial 77214876

YUJI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YUJI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, AND NEUSTADT, P.1940 DUKE STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal key ringsACTIVE—
014Key rings of precious metal; jewelry cases, jewelry, personal ornaments of precious metal; and watchesACTIVE—
019Ceramic tiles; construction materials of ceramics, namely, ceramic bricks and fireproof tiles and bricksACTIVE—
021Tableware of ceramics, namely, ceramic vases, vessels, bowls, plates, and pots; personal ornaments of crystalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 22, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2008ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 25, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 25, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance