USPTO serial 77214957
WESSCO INFLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WESSCO INFLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas S. Kiddé
Thomas S. Kiddé Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP221 North Figueroa StreetSuite 1200Los Angeles, CA 90012Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, NAMELY, DELIVERY TO AIRLINES OF MOISTURIZING LOTION, LIP BALM, TOOTHPASTE, TOOTHBRUSHES, EYE SHADES, SLIPPER SOCKS, AND AMENITY KITS CONTAINING SAME, STAINLESS STEEL CUTLERY, HOLLOWWARE AND SERVING PIECES AND PORCELAIN DINNERWARE, PLASTIC CUPS, PLASTIC CUTLERY, AIR SICKNESS BAGS, PAPER NAPKINS, COTTON AND NON-WOVEN REFRESHER TOWELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |