USPTO serial 77215405
ONLYBUSINESS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONLYBUSINESS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mark Friedman dba Polaris Blue
West Hollywood, CA
Mark Friedman dba Polaris Blue
West Hollywood, CA
Daniel Meyerov dba Polaris Blue
McKinnon Victoria, AU
Daniel Meyerov dba Polaris Blue
McKinnon Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
JOHN ALUMIT PATEL & ALUMIT, PC16830 VENTURA BLVD STE 360ENCINO, CA 91436-1711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Auction management services provided to others over an on-line web site accessed through a global computer network; Marketing services, namely, providing informational web pages designed to generate sales traffic via hyperlinks to other web sites; Preparation of custom or non-custom advertising for businesses for dissemination via the web, CD or DVD for optional upload or download to a computer; Promoting the goods and services of others by means of operating an on-line shopping mall with links to the retail web sites of others; Promoting the goods and services of others by providing a web site at which users can link to other websites; Promoting the goods and services of others by providing hypertext links to the web sites of others; Providing a web site at which users can offer goods for sale and buy goods offered by others; Providing a web site that enables users to post items for sale through on-line classified advertisements; Providing a web site where users can post ratings, reviews and recommendations on products and services; Providing a web site whereby buyers of goods or services locate and receive quotations from multiple competitive sources and sellers of goods or services identify and bid on multiple new sales opportunities; Providing a web site which features advertisements for the goods and services of others on a global computer network; Providing advertising, marketing and promotional services, namely, development of advertising campaigns for web sites; Providing an on-line computer web site that lists healthcare personnel and other individuals who have taken and passed courses and field workshops in order to provide a listing of qualified individuals that can effectively respond to a natural or manmade disaster or act of terrorism; Providing on-line directory information services also featuring hyperlinks to other web sites; Providing space at a web site for the advertisement of the goods and services of others; Rental of advertising space on web sites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mark Friedman dba Polaris Blue
- Other trademarks owned by Mark Friedman dba Polaris Blue
- Other trademarks owned by Daniel Meyerov dba Polaris Blue
- Other trademarks owned by Daniel Meyerov dba Polaris Blue
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ONLYBUSINESS.COM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |