USPTO serial 77215492
DALLAS VENOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DALLAS VENOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caroline L. Keller
CAROLINE L. KELLER PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP725 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2800LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cases for mobile phones; Cases for spectacles and sunglasses; CD cases; CD sleeves; Cell phone covers; Computer game cartridges; Computer game discs; Computer game equipment containing memory devices namely, discs; Computer peripherals; Computer game software; Computer hardware and computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still image and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications; Computer mouse; Computer screen saver software; Computer software for computer and video games; Covers for electric outlets; Decorative magnets; Decorative switch plate covers; Downloadable films and tv programs featuring computer games and video gaming events provided via a video-on-demand; Downloadable multimedia file containing artwork, text, audio, video, games, and Internet Web links relating to the entertainment and gaming industries; Downloadable video recordings featuring gaming events; DVD cases; DVD sleeves; Electronic game software for cellular telephones; Electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; Electronic game software for wireless devices; Eyeglass cases; Eyeglass chains; Game software; Handheld computers; Interactive video game programs; Interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and software; Soundcards; Graphic cards; Mobile phone straps; Mouse pads; Multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM featuring video games; Pre-recorded CD's, video tapes, laser disks and DVD's featuring computer and video games and events related thereto; Prerecorded digital video disks featuring video games and gaming events; Prerecorded video cassettes featuring video games and gaming events; Video discs featuring video games and gaming events; Video game cartridges; Video game discs; Video game interactive hand held remote controls for playing electronic games; Video game interactive remote control units; player-operated electronic controllers for electronic video game machines; Video game software; Video game tape cassettes; Video recordings featuring video games and gaming events; Virtual reality game software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |