Drawing for DALLAS VENOM

USPTO serial 77215534

DALLAS VENOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DALLAS VENOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carolyn S. Lu

Carolyn S. Lu PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP725 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2800LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Address books; Blank writing journals; Book covers; Bookmarks; Brochures about video games and video game tournaments; Bumper stickers; Calendars; Cardboard boxes; Cardboard containers; Date books; Decals; Diaries; Envelopes; Greeting cards; Guide books featuring playing techniques and instruction; Invitation cards; Manuals in the field of video games; Memo pads; Note books; Note paper; Notebook paper; Paper; Paper banners; Paper gift bags; Paper gift tags; Paper napkins; Paper party bags; Paper party decorations; Paper place mats; Paper table cloths; Pen or pencil holders; Pencils; Pens; Photographs; Posters; Printed guides for video games; Printed invitations; Quick reference pocket guides in the field of video games; Coil-bound notebooks; Stickers; Temporary tattoos, all of the preceding items for use in conjunction with a sports computer game leagueACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance