Drawing for VIPER GATE SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 77215706

VIPER GATE SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VIPER GATE SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas R. Williamson III

Thomas R. Williamson III Williamson Intellectual Property Law, LL1870 The ExchangeSuite 100Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electric gate operators; automated security gatesABANDONEDAug 13, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 7, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 7, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 6, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 17, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 18, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance