Drawing for TRANSPHORM

USPTO serial 77215788

TRANSPHORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSPHORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa Greenwald-Swire

Lisa Greenwald-Swire Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrochemical systems, namely, electroplating, electrosynthesis and electrolysis systems comprised of gated electrode structures used for compact electric appliances for providing gas combustion, improved performance of internal combustion engines and for oxygen generationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 5, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 5, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 14, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 14, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 6, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 24, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 24, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance