USPTO serial 77216353
CRUDE ATTITUDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRUDE ATTITUDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sander R. Gelsing
SANDER R. GELSING WARREN SINCLAIR LLP600, 4911 - 51 STREETRED DEER; ALBERTA, T4N6V4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Board games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |