USPTO serial 77217545
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Kenney
ROBERT J KENNEY BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH AND BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | USB drive, portable hard disk drive, flash memory card, compact flash memory card, blank multi-media card, blank secure digital (SD) card, and blank SD combo card, all for use with portable electronic devices for storing and retrieving images, data and audio, blank optical CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-R, DVD-RW discs, USE flash drive, wireless home theater, combo home theater, home theater incorporating DVD, detachable home theater systems, namely, audio-video receivers, audio speakers, CRT display screens, flat panel display screens, audio receivers, video receivers, amplifiers, speaker cables, antennas, video projectors, DVD players, DVD recorders, DVD-cassette combo players, CD players, CD recorders, audio cassette players, video cassette players and headphones; and home theater system components, namely, amplifiers, audio speakers, antennas, DVD players, video cassette players and head phones. audio speakers, head phones, plasma display panel (PDP) TV, liquid crystal display (LCD) TV, digital image controller projection TV, plane TV, terrestrial settop box, satellite settop box, DVD recorder combo, multi-DVD recorder, blank video tape, blank audio tape, video projector, TV remote controls, LAP TOP computer, desktop computer, personal digital assistant (PDA,) digital multimedia broadcast personal digital assistant (DM2 PDA,) computer monitors, computer LCD monitors, computer CRT monitors, computer mouse, computer keyboard, CD-ROM drive for LAP TOP computer, DVD-ROM drive for LAP TOP computer, CD-ROM drive, CD-RW drive, DVD-ROM drive, optical and magneto-optical disc drives and readers for audio, video and computer data, computer audio speakers, PC camera, digital voice recorder, portable GPS navigation receivers, MP3 player, portable DM2 navigation and portable DMB navigation with MP3 player function, namely, GPS equipped personal digital assistants (PDA), wire telephone, wireless telephone, portable communications apparatus, namely, walkie-talkies, hand-held radios, exterior electronic memory for mobile phone, blank miniature secure digital (SD) card, battery charger for mobile phone, USB cable for mobile phone, mobile phone battery, TV cable for mobile phone, charging equipment for mobile phone battery, earphone for mobile phone, mobile phone hand strap, wireless mobile phone headset, wireless earphones, personal headphone for use with sound transmitting systems, wireless transmitting apparatus for sound data, hands free device for mobile phone, telephone hands free kit, telephone headset | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |