USPTO serial 77217552
BLUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Kenney
ROBERT J. KENNEY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | USB drive, portable hard disk drive, flash memory card, compact flash memory card, multi-media card, secure digital (SD) card, and SD combo card, all for use with portable electronic devices for storing and retrieving images, data and audio, blank optical CD-R,CD-RW, DVD-R, DVD-RW discs, USB flash drive, wireless home theater, combo home theater, home theater incorporating DVD, detachable home theater systems, namely, audio-video receivers, audio speakers, CRT display screens, flat panel display screens, audio receivers, video receivers, amplifiers, speaker cables, antennas, video projectors, DVD players, DVD recorders, DVD-cassette combo players, CD players, CD recorders, audio cassette players, video cassette players and head phones; and home theater system components, namely, amplifiers, audio speakers, antennas, DVD players, video cassette players and headphones; audio speakers, headphones, plasma display panel (PDP) TV, liquid crystal display (LCD) TV, digital light processor (DLP) projection, TV, plane TV, terrestrial settop box, satellite settop box, DVD recorder combo, multi-DVD recorder, blank video tape,blank audio tape, video projector, TV remote controls, LAP TOP computer, desktop computer, personal digital assistant (PDA,) digital multimedia broadcast personal digital assistant (DM2 PDA,) computer monitors,computer LCD monitors, computer CRT monitors, computer mouse, computer keyboard, CD-ROM drive for LAP TOP computer, DVD-ROM drive for LAP TOP computer, CD-ROM drive, CD-RW drive, DVD-ROM drive, optical and magneto-optical disc players and recorders for audio,video and computer data, computer audio speakers, PC camera, digital voice recorder, portable GPS navigation receivers, MP3 player, portable DMB navigation and portable DM2 navigation with MP3 player function, namely, OPS equipped personal digital assistants (PDA), wire telephone, wireless telephone, portable communications apparatus, namely, walkie-talkies, hand-held radios, exterior electronic memory for mobile phone, miniature secure digital (SD) card,battery charger for mobile phone, USB cable for mobile phone, mobile phone battery, TV cable for mobile phone, charging equipment for mobile phone battery, earphone for mobile phone, mobile phone hand strap, wireless mobile phone headset, wireless earphones, personal headphone for use with sound transmitting systems, wireless transmitting apparatus for sound data, hands free device for mobile phone, telephone hands free kit, telephone headset | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |