USPTO serial 77217994
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Schulte
CERTISIGN CERTIFICADORA DIGITAL S A COMPANY BRAZILCERQUEIRA CESAR RUA BELA CINTRA904 16 ANDARSAO PAUL SP, 01415 000| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital identity certification devices, namely, radio frequency identification attributes certificates in the form of cards and tags, electric universal identity connectors for use with radio frequency identification cards and tags, blank smart cards, computer embedded software in the form of tokens for use in the field of digital identification, computer embedded software in the form of soft tokens for use in the field of digital identification, GSM chips, computer software for managing digital certificates for mobile applications, computer software for managing digital certificate browser repository, all used on computers, computer hardware and computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed matter, namely, newsletters, reference books, technical journals, instructional materials and teaching materials in the field of technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, lectures, training programs and courses in the fields of private key infra-structure, secure software development, using the web for digital signature applications, and in the field of Secure Application Protocols among other like computer users | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | development, design, implementation, testing, analysis and consulting services in security, access, authorization, authentication, encryption and identification systems for computers, computer hardware and computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |