USPTO serial 77218074
YES TO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YES TO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tel Aviv, IL
Tel Aviv, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Crittenden
John W. Crittenden Cooley LLP777 6th Street, NW, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Intent to Use) Cosmetic creams; non-medicated skin care preparations; skin moisturizers; face creams; skin creams; skin nourishing creams; facial scrubbing preparations; facial masks; night creams; eye creams; cosmetics; make-up; make-up removing preparations; cosmetic preparations for body care; skin and facial cleansing preparations; eye care preparations for cosmetic purposes; perfumery; dentifrices; soaps; essential oils; hair care preparations; anti-aging skin masks; skin care cleansing preparations, namely, facial mud peels; body moisturizing lotions, creams and gels; body scrubbing preparations; shower gels; non-medicated bath preparations; nail care preparations; body sprays; hair and scalp mud masks; hand and elbow moisturizing creams; body butters; sunscreens; (Based on 44(e)) Soaps; perfumery; essential oils; cosmetics; hair lotions; dentifrices; skin, body, eye and hair care preparations, for cosmetic purposes; non-medicated bath preparations; creams, lotions and gels for cosmetic purposes; skin and facial cleansing preparations for personal use; cosmetic preparations containing vegetable extracts or fruit extracts or a combination thereof for face, skin, body and hair care; cosmetic preparations containing vitamins extracts or mineral extracts or a combination thereof for face, skin, body and hair care; cosmetic preparations containing minerals, muds or salts or a combination thereof for face, skin, body and hair care; hair lotions containing vegetable extracts or fruit extracts or a combination thereof; hair lotions containing vitamins extracts or mineral extracts or a combination thereof; hair lotions containing minerals, muds or salts or a combination thereof; make up preparations; makeup removing preparations; vegetable based oils or fruit based oils or a combination thereof for use on the skin, for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use and 44(e)) Retail stores, on-line retail stores, retail services by direct solicitation by sales agents, on-line ordering services, mail order services, mail order catalog services, all featuring cosmetics, toiletries, soaps, perfumery, essential oils, hair lotions, beauty care products, personal care products, skin care preparations, body care preparations, eye care preparations, hair care preparations, dental care products, dentifrices, bath preparations, bathroom apparel, bathroom accessories, toiletry bags, gifts, clothing, food supplements, health food supplements, vitamins, mineral supplements, and accessories related to any of the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |