USPTO serial 77218085
AUDIODNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUJA, SANDRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUDIODNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meyer A. Gross
MEYER A. GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10017-6313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING MEDIA PLACEMENT AUDIT SERVICES TO THE ADVERTISING INDUSTRY THROUGH DIGITALIZATION, COMPRESSION AND INDEXATION OF ADVERTISING SPOTS AIRING ON TELEVISION AND RADIO ALLOWING ADVERTISING INDUSTRY TO VERIFY THEIR MEDIA BUY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |