USPTO serial 77218153
DIM8
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 5, 2009
- Examiner
- MUNSON OTT, MARY DEIRDRE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIM8?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
International Rectifier Corporation
El Segundo, CA
Other trademarks owned by International Rectifier Corporation
International Rectifier Corporation
El Segundo, CA
Other trademarks owned by International Rectifier Corporation
International Rectifier Corporation
El Segundo, CA
Other trademarks owned by International Rectifier Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
CHARLES P. LAPOLLA OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN, LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS7TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductors; integrated circuits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Rectifier Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by International Rectifier Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by International Rectifier Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DIM8
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |