CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DELTAFLOW

USPTO serial 77218279

DELTAFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELTAFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles C. Garvey, Jr.

CHARLES C. GARVEY, JR. GARVEY, SMITH, NEHRBASS & NORTH, L.L.C.3838 N CAUSEWAY BLVD STE 3290METAIRIE, LA 70002-8350UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Flow control devices that relieve excess pressure, namely, rupture disks and pressure relief valves for use with liquids, gasses and liquid gas mixturesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 17, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 4, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 3, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance