USPTO serial 77218451
DEALERDOCS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEALERDOCS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary J. Nelson
GARY J. NELSON CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE ELECTRONIC MANAGEMENT OF DATA AND INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE SALE OF GOODS OR SERVICES, NAMELY, TRACKING SALES AND RELATED LOANS ASSOCIATED WITH SALES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR CREATING AN INTERFACE BETWEEN A SELLER OF GOODS OR SERVICES AND A LENDING INSTITUTION IN ORDER TO FACILITATE LOAN PROCESSING; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR USE BY A SELLER OF GOODS OR SERVICES FOR THE ELECTRONIC MANAGEMENT OF DATA AND INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE PURCHASE OF GOODS OR SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CU Direct Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by CU Direct Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DEALERDOCS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |