Drawing for SNAPPATH

USPTO serial 77218794

SNAPPATH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNAPPATH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacy L. Taylor

Stacy L. Taylor DLA Piper LLP (US)4365 Executive Drive, Suite 1100San Diego, CA 92121UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Assays and reagents for use in genetic research; Biochemical reagents commonly known as probes, for detecting and analyzing molecules in protein or nucleotide arrays; Reagents for research purposes; Reagents for scientific or medical research use; Reagents for use in scientific apparatus for chemical or biological analysisACTIVE—
009Clinical laboratory analyzers for measuring, testing and analyzing blood and other bodily fluids; Plates, glass slides or chips having multi-well arrays that can be used in chemical analysis, biological analysis or patterning for scientific, laboratory or medical research use; Apparatus for testing gas, liquids and solidsACTIVE—
042Scientific research; Scientific research and development; Scientific research in the field of genetics and genetic engineering; Chemical, biochemical, biological and bacteriological research and analysis; Custom design and development of chemical reagents and biochemical assaysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 26, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 27, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 24, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 4, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 3, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance