USPTO serial 77218886
DISCOVERY GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 1, 2010
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DISCOVERY GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
Houston Downtown Park Conservancy
Houston, TX
HOUSTON, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erin S. Hennessy
Erin S. Hennessy Bracewell LLP701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6200Bracewell LLPSeattle, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail Store services featuring gift items, clothing, toys, coffee cups, mugs and other consumer goods, all relating to a recreational park located in Houston, Texas | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DISCOVERY GREEN CONSERVANCY
- Other trademarks owned by DISCOVERY GREEN CONSERVANCY
- Other trademarks owned by Houston Downtown Park Conservancy
- Other trademarks owned by DISCOVERY GREEN CONSERVANCY
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named DISCOVERY GREEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 28, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 28, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2009 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |