Drawing for JENSEN AUDIOVISUAL

USPTO serial 77218897

JENSEN AUDIOVISUAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JENSEN AUDIOVISUAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger N. Behle, Jr.

Roger N. Behle, Jr. FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS, LLP575 Anton Boulevard, Suite 710Costa Mesa, CA 92626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Whole sale stores featuring audiovisual equipment; Retail store services featuring audiovisual equipmentACTIVEDec 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 20, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 6, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 6, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 23, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 23, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 24, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 24, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 4, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 3, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance