USPTO serial 77219025
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy P. Fraelich
TIMOTHY P. FRAELICH JONES DAY901 LAKESIDE AVE E STE 2CLEVELAND, OH 44114-1190UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | News magazine in the fields of large construction projects, engineering, project management, facility start-up, operations and maintenance, and shut-down and decommissioning | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management services in the fields of oil refining, radioactive and hazardous waste processing and mining safety and facilities management | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction services, namely, construction of military bases, storage facilities, pharmaceutical plants, food and beverage plants, oil refineries, fiber optics cable facilities, electronic chip manufacturing facilities, highways, bridges, rail systems, dams, hydroelectric plants, power generating plants, and chemical agent disposal facilities; collection and removal of radioactive waste; disposal of radioactive waste; construction planning services in the fields of threat reduction, defense infrastructure, environmental remediation, nuclear processing, power generating, mining, manufacturing facilities, rail systems, highways and bridges, airports, dams, hydroelectric plants, hazardous waste, high hazard facilities, chemical agent disposal and geologic evaluation | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Waste handling services, namely, packaging for storage, storage, and transportation of radioactive waste | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Waste handling services, namely, incineration of toxic chemical gases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical services, namely, engineering studies, conducting economic feasibility studies and technical feasibility studies, conceptual and detail design for others of processing facilities, buildings and other structures, in the fields of threat reduction, defense infrastructure, environmental remediation, nuclear processing, power generating, mining, manufacturing facilities, railway systems, highways and bridges, airports, dams, hydroelectric plants, hazardous waste, high hazard facilities, chemical agent disposal and geologic evaluation | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security services, namely, threat simulations, vulnerability analysis and mitigation, emergency and crisis response and deployment of security technology, namely, airborne nuclear, chemical and biological material detectors and unconventional nuclear warfare defense systems; consultation services regarding the safety needs of commercial and industrial companies and government agencies in the fields of refining, radioactive and hazardous waste processing and mining | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |