USPTO serial 77219046
YOUR INNOVATION. OUR PROCESS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOUR INNOVATION. OUR PROCESS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Greenwood Village, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D. Abell
MATTHEW D. ABELL HOLLAND & HART LLP555 SEVENTEENTH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80202-3921UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, LICENSING SOFTWARE AND ACTING AS AN APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP) IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMATED MORTGAGE LOAN ORIGINATION, PROCESSING, AND MANAGEMENT FOR USE BY MORTGAGE BANKERS, LENDERS, AND BROKERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |