CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MARY MADE MERRY

USPTO serial 77219063

MARY MADE MERRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARY MADE MERRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley J. Walz

BRADLEY J. WALZ WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A.225 SOUTH SIXTH STREETSUITE 3500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4629

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Artwork, namely, original and reproduction paintings, graphic prints and representationsACTIVE—
020Works of art made of plaster and plastic resinACTIVE—
021Artwork and home decorations in the nature of ceramic plates, coasters, mugs and cupsACTIVE—
024Artwork and home decorations, namely, textile wall hangings, cloth banners and textile signage panelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 26, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 23, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance