USPTO serial 77219204
FRESHNESS FOR ALL THE SENSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4156109Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2012
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRESHNESS FOR ALL THE SENSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richtree Market Restaurants Inc./Richtree Restaurants du Marche Inc.
Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Richtree Market Restaurants Inc./Richtree Restaurants du Marche Inc.
Richtree Market Restaurants Inc./Richtree Restaurants du Marche Inc.
Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Richtree Market Restaurants Inc./Richtree Restaurants du Marche Inc.
Richtree Market Restaurants Inc./Richtree Restaurants du Marche Inc.
Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Richtree Market Restaurants Inc./Richtree Restaurants du Marche Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan S. Nemes
Alan S. Nemes Husch Blackwell LLP190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Franchise services, namely, offering technical and business management assistance in the establishment and operation of restaurants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Training services and conducting seminars in the field of restaurants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Restaurant, catering and take-out restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Richtree Market Restaurants Inc./Richtree Restaurants du Marche Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Richtree Market Restaurants Inc./Richtree Restaurants du Marche Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Richtree Market Restaurants Inc./Richtree Restaurants du Marche Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named FRESHNESS FOR ALL THE SENSES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |