USPTO serial 77219390
ADVANCED LIGHTING MATERIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADVANCED LIGHTING MATERIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Joseph English
D. Joseph English Duane Morris LLP505 9th Street NWSuite 1000Washington, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | AMALGAMS, NAMELY, MERCURY-METAL COMPOUNDS, GETTERS, NAMELY, BORON, BARIUM, ALUMINUM, MAGNESIUM, CALCIUM, STRONTIUM, SODIUM, CESIUM, PHOSPHOROUS, ZIRCONIUM, PALLADIUM, VANADIUM, TITANIUM, COBALT AND COMPOUNDS OR ALLOYS THEREOF, FOR EXCESS GAS ABSORPTION IN LIGHTING PRODUCTS; THIN FILM COATINGS, NAMELY, MULTI-LAYER COATINGS APPLIED ON OBJECTS USING PROCESSES SUCH AS SPUTTERING AND CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION; AND SYNTHETIC QUARTZ | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ELECTRODES AND ELECTRODE ASSEMBLIES FOR HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE LAMPS; METALLIC PARTS FOR DISCHARGE LAMPS AND HALOGEN LAMPS, NAMELY, BALLASTS, STARTERS, IGNITORS, CAPACITORS, FRAMES, SWITCHES, SHELLS AND REACTORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | COATED LAMP REFLECTORS; COATED LAMP BURNERS; COATED FILTERS, NAMELY, FILTERS MADE BY APPLYING A THIN FILM COATING TO OBJECTS; QUARTZ BODIES FOR LAMPS, NAMELY, ARC CHAMBERS, ARC TUBES, LAMP ENVELOPES AND SHROUDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | HIGH PURITY QUARTZ | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named ADVANCED LIGHTING MATERIALS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |