USPTO serial 77220264
QUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSEN, EMILY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark C. Comtois
MARK C. COMTOIS DUANE MORRIS LLP505 9TH STREET, N.W.SUITE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE ASSESSMENTS IN THE FIELD OF DEMAND PLANNING AND FORECASTING, LOGISTICS, SUPPLY CHAIN PLANNING AND SUPPLY PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, CAPACITY PLANNING, PRODUCTION PLANNING, SCHEDULING AND BUSINESS OPTIMIZATION PROCESSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |