CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DCA

USPTO serial 77220309

DCA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DCA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark C. Comtois

Mark C. Comtois Duane Morris LLP505 9th Street, N.W.Suite 1000Washington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CLASSES, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, INTERACTIVE COURSES, AND SIMULATIONS IN THE FIELD OF OPTIMIZING BUSINESS PROCESSES AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS; TRAINING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DEMAND PLANNING AND FORECASTING, LOGISTICS, SUPPLY CHAIN PLANNING AND SUPPLY PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, CAPACITY PLANNING, PRODUCTION PLANNING AND SCHEDULINGACTIVE—
042INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE ASSESSMENTS IN THE FIELD OF DEMAND PLANNING AND FORECASTING, LOGISTICS, SUPPLY CHAIN PLANNING AND SUPPLY PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, CAPACITY PLANNING, PRODUCTION PLANNING, SCHEDULING AND BUSINESS OPTIMIZATION PROCESSESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2009UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Apr 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance