USPTO serial 77220771
POLMIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLMIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Money belt, Shoes, Mountaineering boots, Bath sandals, Bath slippers, Half-boots, Winter boots, Boots, Vinyl shoes, Sandals, Ski boots, Slippers, Soles for footwear, Footwear uppers, Non-slipping devices for boots and shoes, Tips for footwear, Training shoes, Overshoes, Rain boots, Footwear for track and field athletics, Work shoes and boots, Long boots, Gymnastic shoes, Cyclists clothing, Wet suits for water-skiing, Aerobics suits, School uniforms, Raincoats, Overcoats, Liveries, Mantles, Knee trousers, Half-coats, Blousons, Saris, Safaris suits, Suits, Smocks, Skirts, Slack, Mens' suits, Anoraks, not for exercises, Children's clothing, Trousers, Women's ceremonial dresses, Overalls, One piece suits, Infants clothing, Evening dresses, Jackets, Working clothing, Jumpers, Blue jeans, Combinations, Topcoats, Tuxedos, Two piece suits, Tunics, Parkas, Pelisses, Frocks, Girdles, Nightgowns, Aloha shirts, Negligees, Dressing gowns, Rompers, Leotards, Mantillas, Bath robes, Bodices, Body shirts, Brassieres, Blouses, Shower caps, Shirt yokes, Underwear, Drawers, Undershirts, Underpants, Bathing caps, Swimsuits, Bathing trunks, Chemisettes, Chemises, Sweaters, Sweat shirts, Sweat pants, Sports shirts, Slips, white shirt, Uniforms for exercises, Unitards, Jerseys, Vests, Cardigans, Collar protectors, Collar cuffs, Camisoles, Corsets, Tank tops, Teddies, Pajamas Am, Pantyhose, Petticoats, Polo shirts, Pullovers, Tee-shirts, Neckties, Sweat-absorbent stockings, Legwarmers, Leggings, Muffs, Mufflers, Bandanas, Ear muffs, Winter gloves, Mittens, Veils, Boas, Footmuffs, not electrically heated, Shawls, Shoulder wraps, Wimples, Maniples, Scarfs, Stockings, Stoles, Ascots, Socks, Pocket squares, Aprons, Babies' diapers of textile, Pockets for clothing, Tights, Pelerines, Nightcaps, Caps, Sun visors, Berets, Miters, Hoods, Turbans, Top hats, Waterproof clothing, Gaiters, Stocking suspenders, Sock suspenders, Braces for clothing, Leather belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |