Drawing for UNISON

USPTO serial 77220780

UNISON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNISON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virginia R. Richard

VIRGINIA R. RICHARD WINSTON & STRAWN LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166-0005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, operating system software and computer server software featuring instant messaging functions, directory functions, electronic mail features, scheduling features, information and task management functions, document management and sharing features, data exchange functions, mobile information access features and remote data management functions for business users; software for creating, editing and managing websites and intranet sites; all the aforementioned not for use in connection with downloading messages and content from Usenet groupsACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, electronic mail and messaging servicesACTIVE—
039Providing electronic storage and retrieval of use-specified personal and business informationACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing software updates for others via computer networks and the Internet; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider (ASP) for software for use in computer network management software featuring instant messaging functions, directory functions, electronic mail features, scheduling features, information and task management functions, document management and sharing features, data exchange functions, mobile information access features and remote data management functions used in the field of business communications management, and providing hosting, development and maintenance of computer software applications of others in the field of business communications managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
May 5, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 11, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 21, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance