Drawing for GREEN CORE

USPTO serial 77220967

GREEN CORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GREEN CORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Fabrics for the manufacture of T-shirts, garments, pants ; Hand towels ; Hand towels of textile ; Hand-towels made of textile ; Hooded towels ; Kitchen towels ; Large bath towels ; Tea towels ; Terry towels ; Towel sets ; Towels ; Chemical fiber fabrics ; Chenille fabric ; Cheviot fabric ; Cotton base mixed fabrics ; Cotton fabric ; Covered rubber yarn fabrics ; Curtain fabric ; Curtains made of textile fabrics ; Elastic fabrics for clothing ; Elastic yarn mixed fabrics ; Esparto fabric ; Fabric cascades ; Fabric diaper stackers ; Fabric flags ; Fabric for boots and shoes ; Fabric for wrapping bundles ; Fabric impervious to gases for aeronautical balloons ; Fabric of imitation animal skin ; Fabric table runners ; Fabric table toppers ; Fabric valances ; Fabric window coverings and treatments, namely curtains, draperies, sheers, swags and valances ; Hand-towels made of textile fabrics ; Hemp base mixed fabrics ; Hemp yarn fabrics ; Hemp-cotton mixed fabrics ; Hemp-silk mixed fabrics ; Hemp-wool mixed fabrics ; Inorganic fiber mixed fabrics ; Jeans fabric ; Jersey fabrics for clothing ; Jersey materialACTIVEDec 1, 2007
025Clothing, namely, A-shirts, button-front aloha shirts, camp shirts, dress shirts, golf shirts, knit shirts, night shirts, open necked shirts, pique shirts, polo shirts, shirt fronts, shirt yokes, shirts, shirts for suits, short-sleeved or long-sleeved T-shirts, short-sleeved shirts, sleep shirts, sport shirts, sports shirts, sports shirts with short sleeves, sweat shirts, T-shirts, wind shirts, yoga shirts, ankle socks, anklets, anti-perspirant socks, Japanese style socks (tabi covers), Japanese style socks (tabi), men's socks, paper shoes used when going through metal detectors to keep feet and socks clean, sock suspenders, socks, socks and stockings, thermal socks, water socks, woolen socks, balloon pants, capri pants, cargo pants, denim pants, jogging pants, leather pants, lounge pants, non-disposable cloth training pants, nurse pants, pants, petti-pants, ski pants, snow pants, snowboard pants, sweat pants, tap pants, toboggan hats, pants and capsACTIVEAug 1, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2009CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 26, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 26, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 6, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 10, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance