USPTO serial 77221202
YOGU-YOGU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOGU-YOGU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santiago, CL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Gorenstein (Reg. No. 29,271)
CHARLES GORENSTEIN (REG. NO. 29,271) BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Acidophilus milk, Chocolate milk, Condensed milk, Evaporated Milk, Fermented milk, Half and half, Milk, Milk based beverages containing fruit juice, Milk beverages containing fruits, Milk beverages with high milk content, Milk curd, Milk drinks containing fruits, Milk powder, Milk powder for nutritional purposes, Milk proteins, Milk-based beverage containing coffee, Powdered milk for food purposes, Rice milk for use as a milk substitute, Soya milk, Soybean milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Beverages made of coffee, beverages made of tea; chocolate food beverage not being dairy-based or vegetable based; cocoa beverage with milk; coffee flavored syrup used in making food beverages; coffee based beverage containing milk; flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products; flavorings for beverages; Herbal food beverages; mixes in the nature of concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of tea based beverages; prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; scented water for flavoring beverages and tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Aerated fruit juices, Aloe vera juices, Apple juice beverages, Fruit juice bases, Fruit juice concentrates, Fruit juices, Grape juice beverages, Juice base concentrates, Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages, Orange juice beverages, Pineapple juice beverages, Tomato juices, Vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |