Drawing for OTC DERIVATIVES EXCHANGE

USPTO serial 77221487

OTC DERIVATIVES EXCHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OTC DERIVATIVES EXCHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle M. Marsh, Esq.

Michelle M. Marsh, Esq. KENYON & KENYON LLPOne BroadwayNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services of all kinds; financial trading system; financial information; financial services, namely, execution of transacations involving derivative financial instruments by electronic means via global computer network; financial investment in the field of securities and derivative financial instruments; providing pricing, market and trading information for securities and derivative financial instruments by electronic means via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 15, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 15, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 30, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 16, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 3, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 3, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 2, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 2, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance