USPTO serial 77222520
HONEYVILLE FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4105763Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2012
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HONEYVILLE FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vic Y. Lin
VIC Y. LIN Innovation Capital Law Group, LLP19900 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 1150IRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | soup mixes; freeze dried and dehydrated fruits; jams; jellies; fruit-based fillings for bakery desserts freeze dried and dehydrated vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | flavored hot chocolate; powdered soft ice cream blends for making ice-cream; honey; bakery desserts; powdered yogurt blends for making soft serve frozen yogurt; milkshake mixes; chocolate flavored drink mixes, including Champurrado Mexican drink mixes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | fruit punches; powder based sports drinks; powder based smoothies; powder based dessert drinks, namely, lemonade mixes, fruit-flavored drink mixes, slush drink mixes, coffee drink mixes, flavored tea drink mixes, margarita base drink mixes, flavored protein drink mixes, Horchata drink mixes, apple cider mixes, and fruit flavored Mexican drink mixes, including Jamaica drink mixes and Licuado drink mixes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail catalog ordering services, online store services and retail store services featuring food products and beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HONEYVILLE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Honeyville Grain, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Honeyville Grain, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Honeyville Grain, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HONEYVILLE FARMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 6, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ISTB | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE-TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2008 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 5, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |