USPTO serial 77222605
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry Ward
HENRY WARD MOORE & VAN ALLEN, PLLCSUITE 4700100 TYRON STREET NORTHCHARLOTTE, NC 28202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | SYNDICATED NEWSPAPER COLUMNS AND BOOKS ALL FEATURING ADVICE RELATING TO AUTOMOTIVE LAW | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | PRODUCTION OF MOTION PICTURE FILMS, TELEVISION SERIES, ANIMATED TELEVISION AND WEBCAST SERIES RELATING TO AUTOMOTIVE LAW, Providing an online monthly column in the field of advice relating to automotive law | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA WEBSITE IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMOTIVE LAW | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 27, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |