Drawing for AVATYPE

USPTO serial 77223800

AVATYPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVATYPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Ernst

Christopher M. Ernst Law Office of Christopher M. ErnstPO Box 24161CLEVELAND, OH 44124UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business-related personality testing for the selection of personnel, which produces a graphical representation of the user's personality typeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 27, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 27, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance