Drawing for SHELF CENTERED COLLABORATION

USPTO serial 77223885

SHELF CENTERED COLLABORATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHELF CENTERED COLLABORATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Sacoff

ROBERT W. SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting services, namely, advising on business processes and business organizational design for manufacturing, procuring and distributing consumer products through retail channels of tradeACTIVE—
042Technology consulting services, namely, advising on computer system requirements and data needs, and developing computer software, in the field of manufacturing, procuring and distributing consumer products through retail channels of tradeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 26, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 26, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 11, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 13, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance