USPTO serial 77224586
RAMUNTO'S PIZZA EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with RAMUNTO'S PIZZA EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Claremont, NH
Claremont, NH
Claremont, NH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathleen E. Stadecker
Cathleen E. Stadecker Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC199 Main Street, P.O. Box 190Burlington, VT 05402-0190UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ramking, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ramking, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ramking, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named RAMUNTO'S PIZZA EXPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 4, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2010 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |