Drawing for INNOVATION AT THE POINT OF CARE

USPTO serial 77224690

INNOVATION AT THE POINT OF CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNOVATION AT THE POINT OF CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Bryan

Robert H. Cameron Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A.101 N. Tryon St.Suite 1900Charlotte, NC 28246

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009medical systems software to manage medical information, patient records, insurance information, federal health care privacy regulatory compliance, coding and reimbursement compliance and physician performance benchmarking, interoperability of acute and ambulatory healthcare information systems to facilitate data-sharingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 17, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 9, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 26, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 11, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 10, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance