USPTO serial 77224892
REAL ICT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3681900Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 2009
- Examiner
- AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REAL ICT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Adams
Michael D. Adams Mayer Brown LLPP.O. Box 2828Chicago, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer programming services for others; rental of computer software and hardware for online access; application service provider, namely, hosting of databases; technical project planning services related to telecommunications equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |