USPTO serial 77224934
MILOGRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILOGRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Yates Dowell, III
A. YATES DOWELL, III Dowell & Dowell, P.C.103 Oronoco St.Suite 220Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PLANTING SOIL, POTTING SOIL, SYNTHETIC SOIL, NAMELY, ARTIFICIAL CULTIVATION SOIL FOR PLANTS, SPECIALIZED GROWING MEDIA BLENDS FOR PLANTS, PEAT HUMUS, COMPOSTED MANURE, SHRIMP COMPOST, FORESTRY COMPOST, SEA COMPOST, ORGANIC SOIL CONDITIONER FOR AGRICULTURAL OR HORTICULTURAL USE, ORGANIC FERTILIZER, PERLITE, VERMICULITE, AND GRANULAR LIME ALL FOR HORTICULTURAL USE, CHARCOAL FOR HORTICULTURAL PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, GARDENING TOP SOIL, SPHAGNUM PEAT MOSS, CEDAR AND HEMLOCK MULCH, PINE BARK NUGGETS FOR USE AS MULCH, COCOA SHELL MULCH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |