USPTO serial 77225013
FAMOUS BEN'S PIZZA OF SOHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FAMOUS BEN'S PIZZA OF SOHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Staten Island, NY, NY
Staten Island, NY, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOEL BOHMART
JOEL BOHMART BOHMART & SACKS, P.C.60 E 42ND STREETNEW YORK, NY 10165-0006UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 28, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |