USPTO serial 77225177
SUNDANCE FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNDANCE FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori Stockton Kozak
LORI STOCKTON KOZAK BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamins, mineral supplements, nutritional supplements, dietary supplements, herbal supplements; analgesic preparations; antibacterial hand lotions; herbal teas for medicinal purposes; herbal products, namely, aromatherapy packs containing herbs used for relief from headaches, insomnia and sinus discomfort; meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes; meal replacement bars, powders, shakes, and drinks; muscle soaks; nutritionally fortified beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |