USPTO serial 77225487
CHANTY WIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3694560Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2009
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHANTY WIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mexico, D.F. C.P., MX
Mexico, D.F. C.P., MX
Mexico, D.F. C.P., MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Michal
Robert P. Michal Lucas & Mercanti, LLP30 BROAD STREET, 21st FLOORNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Artificial food coloring for cakes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Fruit-based filling for pies; liquid cream of vegetable origin, namely, a non-dairy cream substitute for coffee | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee; cocoa; tea; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; coffee substitutes; flour; processed cereals; bread; pastry; confectionery, namely, cocoa-based ingredient in confectionery products and frozen confectionery; fruit ices; chocolate frosting; chocolate-based and custard-based flavorings; topping syrup; chocolate syrup; edible ice cream; honey; yeast; baking powder; salt; mustard and vinegar; ice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chantilly, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Chantilly, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Chantilly, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CHANTY WIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |