USPTO serial 77225587
WHITEWATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHITEWATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L Hill
RICHARD L HILL HILL JOHNSON & SCHMUTZ4844 NORTH 300 WESTSUITE 300PROVO, UT 84604-5663Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed art reproductions and photographs, imprinted on plastic sheets, plastic strips, and film, paper, vinyl, fabric, stone, and wood for affixing to panels, surrounds, walls, murals, wall hangings, ceilings, furniture, cabinets, doors, windows, counters, stone, concrete, cement, wood, plastic, glass, metal, fiberglass, buildings, swimming pools, swimming pool decks, spas, tubs, showers, vehicles, boats, skis, snowboards, motorcycles, bicycles, aquariums, bird and animal cages, books, and signage; artistic images and artistic designs imprinted on paper for affixing to panels, surrounds, walls, murals, wall hangings, ceilings, furniture, cabinets, doors, windows, counters, stone, concrete, cement, wood, plastic, glass, metal, fiberglass, buildings, swimming pools, swimming pool decks, spas, tubs, showers, vehicles, boats, skis, snowboards, motorcycles, bicycles, aquariums, bird and animal cages, books, and signage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |