Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77225772?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77225772. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns INSIDE JOKE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77225772, the listed owner(s) include: SiTV, Inc., SiTV, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 77225772?

Serial number 77225772 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark INSIDE JOKE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover INSIDE JOKE?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77225772

INSIDE JOKE

Q: What is the current status of INSIDE JOKE?

INSIDE JOKE (77225772) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Jul 10, 2007
Status date: Oct 5, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSIDE JOKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

SiTV, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by SiTV, Inc.
SiTV, Inc.
Glendale, CA
Other trademarks owned by SiTV, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Don Thornburgh

466 FOOTHILL BLVD # 220LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE, CA 91011-3518UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Pre-recorded CDs, video tapes, laser disks and DVDs featuring comedic, dramatic and documentary entertainment	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 16, 2010	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Apr 16, 2010	COAR	TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	—
Oct 5, 2009	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2009	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2009	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2008	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Nov 5, 2008	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Nov 3, 2008	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Oct 30, 2008	XAEC	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	—
Oct 30, 2008	GNEN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Oct 30, 2008	GNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Oct 30, 2008	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Apr 3, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Apr 3, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 13, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 13, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Feb 21, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2007	GPRN	NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 13, 2007	GPRA	PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 13, 2007	CPRA	PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 6, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jul 13, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—